From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Nov 26 16:54:35 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id QAA13208
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 16:54:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from covina.lightside.com (covina.lightside.com [207.67.176.1])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA13197
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 16:54:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (jehamby@localhost) by covina.lightside.com (8.8.3/8.8.3) with SMTP id QAA00430 for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 16:54:16 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 1996 16:54:15 -0800 (PST)
From: Jake Hamby <jehamby@lightside.com>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Is FreeBSD a good baseline for RPC source?
Message-ID: <Pine.AUX.3.94.961126164946.298A-100000@covina.lightside.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I'd like to port RPC over to BeOS for purposes of building NFS and other
RPC services on it.  I know the original Sun RPC source code is available
on UUnet, but I'd like to know if FreeBSD's version has any notable bug
fixes or performance enhancements over the Sun reference version. 
Similarly, would NetBSD, OpenBSD, or Linux provide any advantages or
disadvantages as a baseline source code over FreeBSD or Sun's version?

Thanks in advance!  Feel free to reply to me privately if you don't feel
this is an appropriate topic for the general FreeBSD hackers list.

-- Jake