From owner-freebsd-security Wed Jul 5 15: 2:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from voltage.net (voltage.net [208.189.4.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED6E37B6E2 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2000 15:02:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sward@voltage.net) Received: from amavis by voltage.net with scanned-ok (Exim 3.14 #4) id 139xFX-0004ax-00 for freebsd-security@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2000 17:02:31 -0500 Received: from basketcase.voltage.net ([208.189.4.20]) by voltage.net with esmtp (Exim 3.14 #4) id 139xFV-0004Z7-00 for freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 05 Jul 2000 17:02:29 -0500 Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000705165602.00da1ee0@mail.voltage.net> X-Sender: sward@mail.voltage.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.1 Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 16:57:35 -0500 To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG From: Susie Ward Subject: SecureBSD (Was: Re: Firewalls and the endless story!) In-Reply-To: <20000705170952.O4034@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <20000705202937.64113.qmail@bsdmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-AntiVirus: This email was scanned for known viruses (http://www.voltage.net/virusalert.html) Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 05:09 PM 7/5/00 -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: >Yes, and the original poster demonstrated even further stupidity >by adding a proprietary product (SecureBSD 1.0) into the mix and >then expect that we support it. Speaking of SecureBSD, does anyone have any opinions on the usefulness of SecureBSD? I've thought about testing it out, but I don't have any servers at the moment to be playing with so I've been putting it off. Susie To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message