From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 13 15:49:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A70216A418 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73DEA43D64 for ; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:48:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.NUXI.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k5DFmtxA012549; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:48:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.NUXI.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.NUXI.org (8.13.6/8.13.1/Submit) id k5DFmsbw012548; Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:48:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 08:48:54 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Nathan Whitehorn Message-ID: <20060613154854.GA9037@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <1A384146-1D91-498F-A96D-538A1056AACB@ocsny.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sun Fire servers.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:49:01 -0000 On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 11:05:20PM -0500, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > I'm running 6.1-STABLE on one. Works beautifully. Avoid the SATA RAID. > It's terrible, and causes fs corruption. And you'll need to update to Is this with more tha 4GB of RAM? There was a SATA bug that should be fixed in 6.1-STABLE (but maybe not). -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is top-posting (putting a reply at the top of the message) frowned upon?