From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 27 6:27:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from postfix1.free.fr (postfix1.free.fr [212.27.32.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A87D15665 for ; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 06:26:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jaco@titine.fr.eu.org) Received: from titine.fr.eu.org (toulouse-50-23.dial.proxad.net [212.27.50.23]) by postfix1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8907C283C7; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:26:39 +0100 (MET) Received: by titine.fr.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7C64515135; Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:25:55 +0100 (CET) To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sendmail on current References: <19455.948981705@axl.noc.iafrica.com> From: Eric Jacoboni Date: 27 Jan 2000 15:25:55 +0100 In-Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn's message of "Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:01:45 +0200" Message-ID: <87k8kvh9qk.fsf@titine.fr.eu.org> Lines: 25 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "Bryce Canyon" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sheldon Hearn writes: > On 26 Jan 2000 20:33:31 +0100, Eric Jacoboni wrote: > > > in CURRENT, /usr/sbin/sendmail is a symlink to /usr/sbin/mailwrapper > > (see man mailwrapper). > > No, it's a hard link. I only mention this because your explanation > makes it sound like mailwrapper generates much more overhead than it > really does: No, not on my box (as far as i believe 'ls' and 'file' ;-) : % ls -l /usr/sbin/sendmail lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 26 jan 23:54 /usr/sbin/sendmail -> /usr/sbin/mailwrapper % file /usr/sbin/sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail: symbolic link to /usr/sbin/mailwrapper The mailwrapper manpage also pretends it's a symlink... -- --------------------------------------------------------- Éric Jacoboni « No sport, cigars! » (W. Churchill) --------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message