From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Feb 20 03:42:17 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4AB3F16A4CE; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 03:42:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.bat.ru (dzokonda.xs4all.nl [194.109.164.75])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6597643D1D; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 03:42:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from timur@mail.bat.ru)
Received: from [193.0.1.39] (account timur@mail.bat.ru)
  by mail.bat.ru (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1.8)
  with HTTP id 156290; Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:42:17 +0100
From: "Timur I. Bakeyev" <timur@com.bat.ru>
To: "Mike Jakubik" <mike@afirma.ca>, <dwcjr@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1.8
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:42:17 +0100
Message-ID: <web-156290@mail.bat.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040218141223.67D5B43D2F@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="KOI8-R"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
cc: ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba*
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:42:17 -0000

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:12:18 -0500
  "Mike Jakubik" <mike@afirma.ca> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>	I am just wondering, but shouldn't samba be moved to 
>samba-old and
>samba-devel to samba? It is my understanding that the 
>latest stable code is
>3.0.2a, and the 2.2 branch is only getting security 
>updates.

Well, 3.0 branch isn't yet 'stable' in the FreeBSD sence, 
at least. If you take a look on a samba roadmap, they
expect stability only in the 3.x series of samba. Samba 3 
is still for brave ones or for those who need new features 
badly :)

Cheers,
Timur.