Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2015 10:20:14 -0700 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster -af fails due to dead port - HELP Message-ID: <86fv527c8h.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <55969BB7.2080602@FreeBSD.org> (Matthew Seaman's message of "Fri, 03 Jul 2015 15:27:03 %2B0100") References: <CAFsnNZK120bMrk3qUX2AHK_y%2BZtf_xYC8feqYrHChharh7rv=Q@mail.gmail.com> <20150702195510.GA2863@oslo.ath.cx> <CAFsnNZJLKbPeOyi6M--DZyxW9oqKoMj3YECdmn0vJAzRnHSB0w@mail.gmail.com> <CAFsnNZL4ak3j7RhCBBiJ5JBh6jT=Jr%2BjO5xrdPqUQNe3Ah_5BQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150703023514.GA4554@neutralgood.org> <5595FC4A.6020402@gmail.com> <20150703141324.GA72399@neutralgood.org> <55969BB7.2080602@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Matthew" == Matthew Seaman <matthew@FreeBSD.org> writes: Matthew> As I recall, you *don't* need ZFS with recent versions of Matthew> poudriere. ZFS is recommended, and it certainly makes the Matthew> build-environment wrangling that poudriere does easier. Yes, my DigitalOcean $5/month package build machine does not offer ZFS, so I'm using poudriere there just fine, including having packages pre-built when I went from 8.4 to 9.3 a few weeks ago (just in the nick of time). The DO box is running 10.1, so when I go from 9.3, I can do the same thing again. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>; Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. Still trying to think of something clever for the fourth line of this .sig
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fv527c8h.fsf>