Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Jul 2006 13:54:45 +0100
From:      "Greg Hennessy" <Greg.Hennessy@nviz.net>
To:        "'Michael VInce'" <mv@thebeastie.org>
Cc:        freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
Subject:   RE: PF firewall rules
Message-ID:  <001801c6a4e9$2f8bbca0$0a00a8c0@thebeast>
In-Reply-To: <44B396C3.90205@thebeastie.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 
> 
> I did mention it a few times but I suppose I wasn't clear 
> about it, but I really do want to use "single line firewall 
> rules", and the only way to do this is to keep state, if 
> there are other ways/rules to have really flexible firewall 
> but still with stateful inspection with a small amount of 
> rules I would like to see them.

Yes, RTFMP on tag and tagged. 

Create generic egress rules on all the filtered interfaces with 'tagged'
E.g 

pass out on {int1,int2,int3} $TCP  to any tagged through $KSF

use tag on  ingress rules as appropriate. 
E.g

pass in on int1 $TCP from a to b tag through $KSF
 
Or.. in an environment with no nat, use interface classes on bidirectional
rules combined with anti spoofing. 




Greg




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?001801c6a4e9$2f8bbca0$0a00a8c0>