From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 03:23:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3E61065672 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from janm-freebsd-hackers@transactionware.com) Received: from midgard.transactionware.com (mail2.transactionware.com [203.14.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D08D58FC21 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15243 invoked by uid 907); 19 Jan 2012 03:23:13 -0000 Received: from jmmacpro.transactionware.com (HELO jmmacpro.transactionware.com) (192.168.1.33) by midgard.transactionware.com (qpsmtpd/0.82) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:23:13 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Jan Mikkelsen In-Reply-To: <4F127980.2070806@inse.ru> Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:23:13 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <75F64160-8D26-4A7A-8AB7-50C5A4581B70@transactionware.com> References: <4F127980.2070806@inse.ru> To: Roman Kurakin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hardware supported by ng_frame_relay? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 03:23:15 -0000 On 15/01/2012, at 6:00 PM, Roman Kurakin wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Jan Mikkelsen wrote: >> Hi, >>=20 >> I'm looking to upgrade a system running frame relay over a Sangoma = A101 card and WANPIPE. >>=20 >> Sangoma do not support FreeBSD anymore, so I'm looking for = alternatives. >>=20 >> What hardware does ng_frame_relay support now that ar(4) and sr(4) = are not in FreeBSD 9? >>=20 >> Specifically, will ng_frame_relay work with a Digium TE121 and = ports/dahdi-kmod? >>=20 >> Any suggestions welcome, G.703, X.21 or V.35 interfaces OK. >> =20 > Check also www. cronyx. ru for ce(4) and cp(4). As far as I know, an = old digium adapters were using > software framer for HDLC, but I don'k know the current state. If they = didn't provide hardware framer > now, I suggest to check for any other adapter. Thanks. Just had a look at their site; they support up to 6.x, there is = a red note saying 7.x is not supported. I suspect that would also apply = to 8.x and 9.x ... For now going with a standalone router. Might have a look at the Digium = card more closely if I have a different application for it ... Regards, Jan.