From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 10 13:36:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D1816A506 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:36:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ftp.translate.ru (ftp.translate.ru [195.131.4.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E04D43F93 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2003 13:36:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ip121-248.dialup.wplus.net (ip121-248.dialup.wplus.net [195.131.121.248]) (authenticated bits=0) by ftp.translate.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h9AKXV7T074702; Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:33:39 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2003 00:41:07 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.62r) Personal Organization: Home X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1223794327.20031011004107@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Oliver Eikemeier In-Reply-To: <3F86B135.5050001@fillmore-labs.com> References: <22159707417.20031010130423@serebryakov.spb.ru> <3F868513.4030607@gmx.net> <179171965963.20031010162842@serebryakov.spb.ru> <3F86B135.5050001@fillmore-labs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: Ports conflicts: `lib/libiberty.a' X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Lev Serebryakov List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:36:04 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 20:36:04 -0000 Hello, Oliver! Friday, October 10, 2003, 5:16:37 PM, you wrote: >> It is STATIC library! It could not be used by ALREADY compiled & >> installed ports! And ALL these ports compile this library by >> itself and use OWN version on build stage, and DON'T use installed >> library! OE> Then perhaps it shouldn't be installed anyway? I think so. But authors of binutils/gcc have other opinion (they are GNU people and like to push their COPYING, libibery, etc. in each hole). >> And, If I write CONFLICTS=, based on `lib/libiberty.a', IT WILL BE >> IMPOSIIBLE to install cross-binutils & cross-gcc EVENT for one platform >> together! It is very strange situation, IMHO. OE> If you don't care, you could install them with DISABLE_CONFLICTS=yes. I think, it is invalid situation. Because DISABLE_CONFLICTS=yes could afraid some users and here is no conflicts, really, but overwriting of unused files. Lev Serebryakov