From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 26 01:00:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8178D16A403; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6851D13C48A; Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13EA1A4D88; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 18:01:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A3ADD51464; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:00:40 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 21:00:40 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Maxim Sobolev Message-ID: <20070426010040.GA79683@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200704260011.l3Q0Bcxo039783@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070426001822.GA79250@xor.obsecurity.org> <462FF29E.6010501@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <462FF29E.6010501@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/zaptel Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/misc/zaptel/files patch-Makefile patch-qozap::Makefile patch-qozap::qozap_freebsd.c patch-tau32pci::tau32pci.c patch-test::Makefile patch-wcfxo::wcfxo.c patch-wcfxs::wcfxs.c patch-wct1xxp::wct1xxp.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 01:00:41 -0000 --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 05:30:22PM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >Maxim, > > > >For some reason you have ignored at least 2 emails from portmgr > >inquiring why you have been making apparently unapproved commits to > >other people's ports (your previous 3 commits were such). Since you > >are ignoring our private emails I have no choice but to ask you > >publically to respond immediately. >=20 > I apologize, due to some ages old filter (leftover from the time when I= =20 > was on portmgr) the messages went into the wrong folder, which I don't=20 > check. Now I see them. >=20 > Regarding the commits in question: are there any technical problems with= =20 > my changes? If my memory serves in the past there were general agreement= =20 > that maintainer's approval is good, but is not strictly required for the= =20 > cases when the change is obvious. Unfortunately I don't have much spare= =20 > time in my hands nowadays so that need to send e-mail for each of those= =20 > small fixes could be a showstopper for me and result in them staying in= =20 > my private tree. That being said, I don't ask to make an exception for=20 > me based on that and if you say that the policy now is that maintainer=20 > approval is strictly required I will adhere. >=20 > Another generic note from my experience with other open source projects,= =20 > is that usually ones with not-so-strict approval rules tend to make much= =20 > faster progress. As far as I know that has never been the policy. If you are worried that you will not have time later to follow up, you can just send a PR and let the system work as designed: this method seems to work well enough for all our non-committers out there ;-) Kris --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGL/m4Wry0BWjoQKURAgqHAJsHs6g7Dm6Wpd/SaLdkplKtbB+cUQCeNWQH gU2S/hS53/5qinRSugtwfW8= =9M+P -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --4Ckj6UjgE2iN1+kY--