From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep  2 20:36:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A1316A4CE
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Sep 2004 20:36:31 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from yertle.kcilink.com (yertle.kcilink.com [65.205.34.180])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC9543D3F
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu,  2 Sep 2004 20:36:30 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from vivek@khera.org)
Received: from [192.168.7.103] (host-103.int.kcilink.com [192.168.7.103])
	by yertle.kcilink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256662178A;
	Thu,  2 Sep 2004 16:36:30 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <4137822F.4030606@forrie.com>
References: <4137822F.4030606@forrie.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <C545F5F2-FD1F-11D8-8F5B-000A9578CFCC@khera.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:36:30 -0400
To: Forrest Aldrich <forrie@forrie.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619)
cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Postfix (current and release) issues...
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 20:36:31 -0000


On Sep 2, 2004, at 4:27 PM, Forrest Aldrich wrote:

> The port for the official release of postfix is failing the patches 
> (reported to maintainer, awaiting a response).  Does anyone have a 
> clean patch for this or did I hit a bug.
>

The SPF patch and the TLS patches conflict.  Nobody has stepped up to 
provide versions that play together well, like the IPv6+TLS combo 
patch.