From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 23:33:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C8A82F2; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:33:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD667161C; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s0SNXdwK084919 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:33:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s0SNXdnE084918; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:33:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 15:33:39 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: svn commit: r261246 - in head: . cddl/contrib/opensolaris/tools/ctf/cvt contrib/elftoolchain lib/libdwarf lib/libelf sys/sys Message-ID: <20140128233339.GA84881@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <201401282138.s0SLcsVV085769@svn.freebsd.org> <62D9690C-16B3-4ECF-B534-4D454989865D@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) Cc: "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , Pedro Giffuni , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , Kai Wang X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 23:33:41 -0000 On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 03:01:39PM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. and was this tested on anything other than i386/amd64? > > Don't be too hasty to MFC; us guys in ARM, PPC, MIPS, SPARC and IA64 > world have to now retest everything. It'll take time for this to shake > out. > No kidding! There should be a much longer wait period than the 3 days that appears common for a MFC (unless the patch fixes a critical bug). I suspect that there are not as many people running top-of-tree current as some committer seem to assume. At the moment, I fear that there is a rather nasty bug in either UFS2, USB, CAM, or code generation for Intel core2 duo processors in current. I further fear that I'll need to go back to a circa Aug 2013 current and perform bisection with svn. :( -- Steve