From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jun 28 23:38: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from info.iet.unipi.it (info.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 696B337BA82; Wed, 28 Jun 2000 23:37:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from luigi@info.iet.unipi.it) Received: (from luigi@localhost) by info.iet.unipi.it (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA44052; Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:38:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from luigi) From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <200006290638.IAA44052@info.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: load balancing In-Reply-To: from Cyrille Lefevre at "Jun 29, 2000 01:16:52 am" To: clefevre@citeweb.net Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2000 08:38:55 +0200 (CEST) Cc: "Rashid N. Achilov" , freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL61 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > "Rashid N. Achilov" writes: > > > We have two Internet providers through leased lines at 64k and 128k respectively. This lines goes > > through one FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE server. What can I make channels load balancing? (When first channel > > is using more than second, all traffic goes through second and vice versa...) Change FreeBSD to > > something else don't offer. > > man dummynet sould be a good starting point. i don't see how it could help at the moment. There are routing issues to solve in the first place. cheers luigi -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- Luigi RIZZO, luigi@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL/FAX: +39-050-568.533/522 . via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) Mobile +39-347-0373137 -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message