Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 14:14:39 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193183] [STAGE] net/beacon: Request MAINTAINERship, pkg-descr cleanup Message-ID: <bug-193183-13-5pPORFp7rS@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-193183-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-193183-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193183 --- Comment #21 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #20) > I naturally get > lib/perl5/%%PERL_VER%%/%%PERL_ARCH%%/perllocal.pod.gz so add that to the pkg-plist then, right? > While I have no illusions about my being the new kid on the block. > I can't help but ask; why is not squashing perllocal.pod a bad thing(tm)? Because MANCOMPRESSED is undocumented, it's not supposed to do anything, and it could be removed tomorrow. It is pre-stage code. It was also for man pages, and nothing to do with perl/pod. > > I'll post an additional diff, citing perllocal.pod.gz, and removing > perllocal.pod, and let you decide. But I would greatly appreciate > reason(s) why my addition of MANCOMPRESSED is a bad thing(tm). :) I'll let you answer this one by showing me where in the porter's handbook it says to use MANCOMPRESSED or where in Mk/ is MANCOMPRESSED documented for staged ports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-193183-13-5pPORFp7rS>