Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 02:31:07 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick <koitsu@FreeBSD.org> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Cc: Roland Smith <rsmith@xs4all.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TRUE realtime priority Message-ID: <20081007093107.GA44339@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20081007111712.X5855@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20081006221523.P3921@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20081006215749.GA68933@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <20081007111712.X5855@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 11:18:32AM +0200, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> Well, basically you are the only one who can answer that. And that's not >> a paradox or an attempt at humor. You should investigate. Maybe >> interrupts aren't processed fast enough (hardware sharing an >> interrupt?), or memory or kernel resources are low. > > well last night i tested it with SCHED_4BSD instead of sched_ule, reduced > quantum to 20000 from 100000 and for now - no voice chopping under high > load. but i will test it more. What version of FreeBSD are you using for this? Yes, it matters. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc at parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081007093107.GA44339>