From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 19 17:53:41 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B356516A400; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1.sentex.ca [64.7.153.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A19D13C483; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:53:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from lava.sentex.ca (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l2JHreww082252; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:53:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from mdt-xp.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [192.168.43.27]) by lava.sentex.ca (8.13.8/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l2JHreQ3061174 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:53:40 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <200703191753.l2JHreQ3061174@lava.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:51:48 -0400 To: Pete French , freebsd-net@freebsd.org, jkim@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa In-Reply-To: References: <200703161430.42854.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90, clamav-milter version devel-120207 on clamscanner3 X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] bge(4) patch for -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:53:41 -0000 At 12:28 PM 3/19/2007, Pete French wrote: > > I have made bge(4) patch for -STABLE (sorry, not suitable for > > RELENG_6_2): > >What dates stable is this relative to ? I am trying to apply your >patch to a cvsup of stable pulled on the day/time you sent your email, >but parts of it are failing for me unfortunately. I would like to test this >as I have a nmuber of bge interfaces running on some systems. Mine applied cleanly to sources from last Friday. So far so good for me in that I have not yet seen the watchdog timeout (previously once every 4 days or so) but its too early to tell. Still, I have not seen any regressions with it yet since installing it last Saturday. This is a fairly busy recursive DNS server ---Mike