From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 22 17:00:32 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E75716A41F for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:00:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF1F43D45 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:00:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9MH0Vm4072019 for ; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:00:31 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9MH0VDn072018; Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:00:31 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:00:31 GMT Message-Id: <200510221700.j9MH0VDn072018@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Richard Hirner Cc: Subject: Re: bin/87843: FreeBSD specific gcc compiler error X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Richard Hirner List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 17:00:32 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/87843; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Richard Hirner To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, richard@hirner.at Cc: Subject: Re: bin/87843: FreeBSD specific gcc compiler error Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 18:53:58 +0200 As I wrote in the gcc bug report, the compilation failed even if I removed -march=athlon and -O when calling cc (i.e. the optimisation flags were set in make.conf, then it failed, then i called the command line which failed without -march -O and it failed again). Interestingly, I have now removed CPUTYPE=athlon and CFLAGS=-O -pipe from make.conf and I don't get the error. How can that be? I thought it would be enough if I removed the optimisation flags from the one cc call that failed. However, thank you for the hint, it works now.