Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:41:23 -0700
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        vkashyap@freebsd.org, gibbs@freebsd.org, nork@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com
Subject:   Re: aha(4) doesn't depend on cam(4).
Message-ID:  <44237873.7020102@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060323.104913.122061815.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <20060324011416.acd8df42.nork@FreeBSD.org>	<20060324013616.1b6f66ac.nork@FreeBSD.org>	<20060324014047.95ffc1e3.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20060323.104913.122061815.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20060324014047.95ffc1e3.nork@FreeBSD.org>
>             Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org> writes:
> : Hi aha(4) maintainers!
> : 
> : 	I have a patch for aha(4).
> 
> Actually, I'm the aha maintainer.
> 
> Why is this needed?  Is it because aha references symbols that would
> otherwise be undefined?
> 
> Warner
> 

I think what he wants is to have cam.ko load when aha.ko is loaded (I'm
taking a leap here in that I haven't checked to see if aha.ko exists).
It's a harmless patch anyways, not sure why there needs to be an
argument about it.

Scott




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44237873.7020102>