Date: Sat, 15 Mar 1997 04:24:26 -0800 (PST) From: asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: joerg@freefall.freebsd.org Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/xperfmon/patches patch-aa patch-ab patch-ac patch-ad ports/sysutils/xperfmon/scripts configure ports/sysutils/xperfmon Makefile ports/sysutils/xperfmon/files freebsd_system.c ports/sysutils/xperfmon/pkg DESCR PLIST Message-ID: <199703151224.EAA01615@baloon.mimi.com> In-Reply-To: <199703151036.CAA15313@freefall.freebsd.org> (message from Joerg Wunsch on Sat, 15 Mar 1997 02:36:11 -0800 (PST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* 1.11 +11 -9 ports/sysutils/xperfmon/Makefile Joerg, please do not commit submitted Makefiles blindly. This is a classic example of why I insist people submit patches for port updates even if the patch is bigger than the whole thing. Of those 11 lines of changes, only three (version in the comment, PKGNAME, and $Id$ line that someone screwed up a long time ago) were meaningful changes. The others were spent backing out the cleaning up we have done in revision 1.9 and 1.10. :( I'm going to commit the fix now. By the way, does Lars change the version without touching the distfile at all? (The distfile is more than two years old, and we've had three version-ups since then, without ever touching files/md5!) Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703151224.EAA01615>