From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 1 07:41:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCA816A422; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 07:41:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA3943D55; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 07:41:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k217dY8U060512; Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:39:34 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <44054FB8.5010707@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:39:36 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051230 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cokane@cokane.org References: <200602252159.k1PLxT8G036312@repoman.freebsd.org> <4400D478.7060707@samsco.org> <20060227194350.A57612@newtrinity.zeist.de> <864q2j5voi.fsf@xps.des.no> <346a80220602282337n3a2786c1qf4f9358fa6be73d4@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <346a80220602282337n3a2786c1qf4f9358fa6be73d4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-src@freebsd.org, Maksim Yevmenkin , cvs-all@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/kbdmux kbdmux.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 07:41:06 -0000 Coleman Kane wrote: > On 2/28/06, *Dag-Erling Smørgrav* > wrote: > > "Maksim Yevmenkin" > writes: > > we should make a decision which scancodes keyboard drivers should be > > returning and change kbdmux(4), syscons(4) etc. to support it. > > > > until then, i'm afraid, sun rs232 and powerpc adb keyboard drivers > > will have to translate their own scancodes into at scancodes (just > > like ukbd(4) does). > > Considering that ukbd(4) is the only kbd driver that runs on all > platforms, it might make sense to have all other drivers translate > their scancodes to ukbd(4) scancodes and use that in kbdmux(4) and > syscons(4). > > > I agree, especially since atkbdc's are rapidly being replaced by USB on > the platforms they were made for. > Long term, yes, but what is the risk/benefit of doing this for 6.1? Scott