Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:54:51 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> To: Trevor Blackwell <tlb@tlb.org> Cc: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB serial device naming Message-ID: <200912142254.52874.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <EA0E62B3-52AA-4D46-8C35-5FFDD0EA5207@tlb.org> References: <43EC7D78-31E5-4B86-9316-002AE650727A@tlb.org> <200912141006.01480.hselasky@c2i.net> <EA0E62B3-52AA-4D46-8C35-5FFDD0EA5207@tlb.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 14 December 2009 18:44:01 Trevor Blackwell wrote: > > USB_IOCTL_GET_PARENT_NAME > > That seems like the right approach. Is there only ever one associated > "parent" driver? Are there cases where it should report both a serial > & network interface? That's a good question how to best standardise this. Probably the IOCTL is useful for other busses too. --HPS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200912142254.52874.hselasky>