From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jul 11 22:13:05 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06B81065670;
	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:13:04 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org)
From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 18:12:49 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
References: <201107072002.16059.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
	<201107081729.46242.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <4E1B089C.90001@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E1B089C.90001@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201107111812.52110.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [CFT] Update OpenJDK6 to b23
X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD <freebsd-java.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java>,
	<mailto:freebsd-java-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:13:05 -0000

On Monday 11 July 2011 10:28 am, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 09/07/2011 00:29 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> > On Friday 08 July 2011 04:23 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> >> On Friday 08 July 2011 06:17 am, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>> on 08/07/2011 03:02 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
> >>>> I have a patch to update java/openjdk6 to b23:
> >>>>
> >>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23.diff
> >>>>
> >>>> Please test and report any regression.
> >>>
> >>> Can this update be used as a chance to spin off icedtea web
> >>> plugin into a separate port?
> >>
> >> I was going to do it separately but I think it's clearer.
> >>
> >> IcedTea-Web 1.1 port:
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/icedtea-web-ports.tar.gz
> >>
> >> (Updated) java/openjdk6 patch:
> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23_1.diff
> >
> > BTW, I have alternative port/patch:
> >
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/icedtea-web-ports_1.tar.gz
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/openjdk6-b23_2.diff
> >
> > Basically, the IcedTea patch for IcedTea-Web is controlled by
> > ICEDTEA option and it is turned on by default.
> >
> > I am not sure which is better. :-/
>
> Thanks a lot for doing all of this!
> I slightly prefer the second approach, but it is your call :)

Now icedtea-web and openjdk6 are committed.  Please read UPDATING for 
the new instructions.

Thanks for your feedback!

Jung-uk Kim