From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 13 20:16:35 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1470D16A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:16:35 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA6C43D1D
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:16:34 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6DKGQkA024365;
	Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:16:26 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 13 Jul 2004 12:46:24 PDT."
             <16628.15376.651824.540615@ran.psg.com> 
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 22:16:26 +0200
Message-ID: <24364.1089749786@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
cc: Barney Wolff <barney@databus.com>
cc: Jason Dusek <jason-dusek@uiowa.edu>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: CVSUP and 5.2.1 RELEASE 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:16:35 -0000

In message <16628.15376.651824.540615@ran.psg.com>, Randy Bush writes:
>> And your argument here is that people are reciprocally less likely
>> to hose (or as it may be: not hose) their systems because the have
>> to type 27 characters more to do so ?
>
>let me ask a different question.  what is the need for 'make world'?

It is mentioned in approximately 22900 hits on google:

http://www.google.com/search?q=%22make+world%22+freebsd&sourceid=opera&num=0&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

We are not going to rename /dev/null either.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.