From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Nov 4 14:18:34 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA13951 for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 14:18:34 -0800 Received: from cls.net (freeside.cls.de [192.129.50.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id OAA13921 for ; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 14:18:28 -0800 Received: by mail.cls.net (Smail3.1.28.1) from allegro.lemis.de (192.109.197.134) with smtp id ; Sat, 4 Nov 95 22:18 GMT From: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Organisation: LEMIS, Schellnhausen 2, 36325 Feldatal, Germany Phone: +49-6637-919123 Fax: +49-6637-919122 Reply-To: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Received: (grog@localhost) by allegro.lemis.de (8.6.9/8.6.9) id WAA21220; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 22:52:41 +0100 Message-Id: <199511042152.WAA21220@allegro.lemis.de> Subject: Re: Hmmmm! `resvport' keyword not documented *anywhere*? To: terry@lambert.org (Terry Lambert) Date: Sat, 4 Nov 1995 22:52:40 +0100 (MET) Cc: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers) In-Reply-To: <199511042127.OAA10307@phaeton.artisoft.com> from "Terry Lambert" at Nov 4, 95 02:27:04 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 506 Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Terry Lambert writes: > > > > And the mount_nfs man page does not describe how to put FS specific > > > mount options into the fstab. 8-(. > > > > The same way as you would on the `mount' command line, with the > > exception that `ro' or `rw' must come first. > > You mean as dash options. > > This begs the question of "why have undocumented word options at all?". You've put in a superfluous word: that should read "why have undocumented options at all?". Looks like it's my problem now :-) Greg