From owner-cvs-all Wed Jul 11 4:22:39 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FD737B401; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 04:22:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from sheldonh@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f6BBMWw67036; Wed, 11 Jul 2001 04:22:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh) Message-Id: <200107111122.f6BBMWw67036@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Sheldon Hearn Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 04:22:32 -0700 (PDT) To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: cvs commit: ports/mail/exim Makefile pkg-install pkg-message ports/mail/exim/files patch-src::configure.default X-FreeBSD-CVS-Branch: HEAD Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG sheldonh 2001/07/11 04:22:32 PDT Modified files: mail/exim Makefile pkg-install pkg-message mail/exim/files patch-src::configure.default Log: Too many people have complained about my choice of MTA user (sendmail). Bite the bullet _now_ and use MTA user exim instead. This means that only early adopters of Exim-3.31 are affected, rather than lots more folks further down the line. I still think mailnull is better, but nobody in the Exim community agrees with me. :-) Bump PORTREVISION as appropriate. Revision Changes Path 1.92 +2 -2 ports/mail/exim/Makefile 1.2 +6 -4 ports/mail/exim/pkg-install 1.6 +2 -2 ports/mail/exim/pkg-message 1.4 +2 -2 ports/mail/exim/files/patch-src::configure.default To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message