From owner-cvs-all Fri Dec 11 22:55:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA24907 for cvs-all-outgoing; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 22:55:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA24902 for ; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 22:55:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA23821; Fri, 11 Dec 1998 22:55:06 -0800 (PST) To: shmit@kublai.com cc: dima@best.net, Matthew Dillon , des@flood.ping.uio.no, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/rc.local In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 12 Dec 1998 00:17:42 EST." <19981212001742.L29799@kublai.com> Date: Fri, 11 Dec 1998 22:55:05 -0800 Message-ID: <23818.913445705@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > It does? I've rarely worked with a machine that has an empty > rc.local. What if I want to run MySQL, or Apache, or ftpd in stand > alone mode, or any of the millions of other things that people can > do in rc.local? The answer is that such things no longer belong in rc.local; we've already transitioned away from this (long ago) in favor of the rc.d/ mechanism. You can't argue for new mechanisms and against them in the same breath. :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message