Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 17:18:02 +0100 From: "mal content" <artifact.one@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_* [was: Problems creating port, pkg_info?] Message-ID: <8e96a0b90607160918w698bcea2i58edba9e1ba2d18@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8e96a0b90607160744n306e8db8j17e56a799c6e3381@mail.gmail.com> References: <8e96a0b90607160621p7a75a63esdff83f98a5652764@mail.gmail.com> <44BA46A3.2020205@netinertia.co.uk> <8e96a0b90607160721i4bbe3cd1w245579b84652ccd8@mail.gmail.com> <44BA4D96.6000402@netinertia.co.uk> <8e96a0b90607160744n306e8db8j17e56a799c6e3381@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I deleted all installed packages to clear up the mess, I've not worked up the nerve to play about with ports again but I do need to in the future as I have a few ports to submit + maintain. Is it safe to mix ports and packages? I would like to use binary packages for the majority but I can see that I'm going to have to use ports for a couple of applications that I use that don't have binary packages. MC
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8e96a0b90607160918w698bcea2i58edba9e1ba2d18>