From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Oct 13 2:21:19 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from epsilon.lucida.qc.ca (epsilon.lucida.qc.ca [216.95.146.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B906537B66C for ; Fri, 13 Oct 2000 02:21:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 22304 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Oct 2000 09:21:13 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 13 Oct 2000 09:21:13 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 05:21:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Heckaman X-Sender: matt@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca To: David Greenman Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Subject: Re: mbuf leakage on 4.1.1-STABLE In-Reply-To: <200010130859.BAA10082@implode.root.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 13 Oct 2000, David Greenman wrote: ... : Perhaps I should have spoken up earlier, but none of these reports has : indicated a problem. The "92%" above is the percent of buffers that have been : allocated and are currently in-use. The system allocates more when the pool : runs out. The % in use is essentially a useless number that shouldn't even : be reported because it just causes confusion about what it means. Sounds like a chance for a FAQ entry? I know I got caught by that originally till I sat down and thought about it for a while, might be nice to have. :) : -DG * Matt Heckaman - mailto:matt@lucida.qc.ca http://www.lucida.qc.ca/ * * GPG fingerprint - A9BC F3A8 278E 22F2 9BDA BFCF 74C3 2D31 C035 5390 * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE55tQJdMMtMcA1U5ARAr2VAJsHeHGh7t8K6UYbG5ApYG/h9ElZjQCffYY4 zGYXNcARIHhJx8F20rq5w2M= =5VGI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message