From owner-freebsd-current Sat Jan 27 11:17:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.com (gw.nectar.com [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A829C37B400; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 11:17:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by gw.nectar.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B5ABF193F0; Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:17:22 -0600 (CST) Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:17:22 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Steve O'Hara-Smith Cc: John Baldwin , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: patch for test: /etc/shells -> /usr/local/etc/shells Message-ID: <20010127131722.A17867@spawn.nectar.com> References: <20010127091814.567fda08.steveo@eircom.net> <20010127135740.7183f71f.steveo@eircom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010127135740.7183f71f.steveo@eircom.net>; from steveo@eircom.net on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 01:57:40PM +0100 X-Url: http://www.nectar.com/ Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 01:57:40PM +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > Life is better than I thought the crypto stuff just has it as a fallback > conditional on HAVE_GETUSERSHELL so that uses the one from libc. Which leaves > only sendmail which is similar but for some reason does not have HASGETUSERSHELL > set for FreeBSD (I think - the conf is convoluted). > > Meanwhile I am building with a getusershell(3) that knows how to follow > a #include (it was already looking for # which pushed the bikeshed marginally > that way). You could just use the nsdispatch() API that is in -CURRENT, and that getusershell() uses. -- Jacques Vidrine / n@nectar.com / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message