From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jul 27 20: 9:21 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from magicnet.magicnet.net (magicnet.magicnet.net [204.96.116.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BABB1518B for ; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 20:09:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bill@bilver.magicnet.net) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by magicnet.magicnet.net (8.8.6/8.8.8) with UUCP id XAA27091 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 23:07:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from bill@localhost) by bilver.magicnet.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id WAA10638 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Tue, 27 Jul 1999 22:43:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Vermillion Message-Id: <199907280243.WAA10638@bilver.magicnet.net> Subject: Re: network hangs In-Reply-To: <19990728004624.D441614D97@hub.freebsd.org> from Steven Grady at "Jul 27, 1999 5:46: 5 pm" To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 27 Jul 1999 22:43:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Steven Grady recently said: > I got a response to my question; I thought I'd reply to the list. > > I have a question about this. > > > de0: enabling 10baseT port > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > Shouldn't that be 100baseT? Or does the kernel not report this. > I'm not sure, but the connection is definitely 100 Mbit, as verified > by a fast transfer of a large file But meanwhile, we reconfigured the > interface to talk at 10Mbit, but that didn't help. I have heard of instances where auto-negotiation failed - and the best bet was to configure the NIC card to be physically at one speed or the other. -- bv@wjv.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message