From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 31 05:00:09 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA08624 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 05:00:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA08619 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 05:00:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.5) id FAA09550; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 05:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 05:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199808311200.FAA09550@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG From: Ian Vaudrey Subject: Re: ports/7789: [PATCH] cyrus imapd is outdated (and does not build in many situations) Reply-To: Ian Vaudrey Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/7789; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Ian Vaudrey To: "FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG" Cc: "'hans@artcom.de'" Subject: Re: ports/7789: [PATCH] cyrus imapd is outdated (and does not build in many situations) Date: Mon, 31 Aug 1998 12:56:09 +0100 I'd like to raise a couple of points on this PR http://www.scriptics.com/software/download.html says: "Tcl/Tk 8.1. These are the newest experimental releases; they are available only in alpha form, so they are not very stable yet." Should we not be depending on tcl-8.0.2 instead? The last part of these patches refers to a separate port, i.e. my port of Makedepend. I think that should've been on a separate PR, copied to me? Also, wasn't the man/man1/makedepend.1.gz line deliberately dropped from the PLIST because of the recent changes to bsd.port.mk? - Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message