From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 18 16:22:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F39516A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:22:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (outbound04.telus.net [199.185.220.223]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA25443D1F for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:22:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cpressey@catseye.mine.nu) Received: from catseye.biscuit.boo ([154.5.85.228]) by priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.netSMTP <20040319002226.EOBY14935.priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net@catseye.biscuit.boo>; Thu, 18 Mar 2004 17:22:26 -0700 Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:27:55 -0800 From: Chris Pressey To: Paul Seniura Message-Id: <20040318162755.52513b6c.cpressey@catseye.mine.nu> In-Reply-To: <20040318213442.D38635C35@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> References: <200403122136.i2CLaCm9096276@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040318213442.D38635C35@techpc04.okladot.state.ok.us> Organization: Cat's Eye Technologies X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.9 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I believe lang/icc* are not open-source nor 'free', right? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 00:22:27 -0000 On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:34:42 -0600 (CST) "Paul Seniura" wrote: > I don't want to discuss Intel compilers on AMD or whatever > else the issues are in the previous threads. > > I am posting this on the -ports forum because I am asking > about lang/icc* strictly as ports and how I will use them > as ports. > [...] > If, for example, in the future any part of the CD ISOs are > built by 'icc', then I/we are forbidden to use them. OK... so don't use the icc port to do that... ? > I will therefore absolutely oppose any such changes in > FreeBSD itself, in its default build configurations, in > its (binary or 'ready-to-run') distribution, and so on. > > Keep FreeBSD 'free' AND open-source. > > All of it. FreeBSD != ports/packages. That's what "3rd-party" means. -Chris