From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue May  7  2: 4:48 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04F0437B403
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue,  7 May 2002 02:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g4794YcL086299;
	Tue, 7 May 2002 13:04:37 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g4794WBk086298;
	Tue, 7 May 2002 13:04:32 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:04:32 +0400
From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de>
Cc: Dominic Marks <dominic_marks@btinternet.com>, ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-1.3.24_2
Message-ID: <20020507090431.GA86245@nagual.pp.ru>
References: <3CD30C9C.BBFA5DC5@liwing.de> <20020504023109.B921@host217-41-52-202.in-addr.btope> <20020504023327.D921@host217-41-52-202.in-addr.btope> <3CD3C006.DCB42156@liwing.de> <20020504181251.GA11045@nagual.pp.ru> <3CD504EE.828802D1@liwing.de> <20020507045135.GA84039@nagual.pp.ru> <3CD7861A.8CE2A8CA@liwing.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3CD7861A.8CE2A8CA@liwing.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 09:45:30 +0200, Jens Rehsack wrote:

> Me too. But without this, mod_perl asks for it, and with it, it doesn't.
> Search in /usr/ports/www/mod_perl/work/mod_perl*/Makefile.PL (after a
> make patch) for it.

It means that mod_perl must be fixed instead.

> there? Why do not accept the defaults and let the admin change anything if
> required.

I think that way too. But defaults must be created before they can be
accepted. Port is exact for this purpose.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message