From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Nov  9 03:36:38 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 36E8716A4CE; Tue,  9 Nov 2004 03:36:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from f15.mail.ru (f15.mail.ru [194.67.57.45])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E162243D39; Tue,  9 Nov 2004 03:36:37 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from shmukler@mail.ru)
Received: from mail by f15.mail.ru with local 
	id 1CRMo8-000GCW-00; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 06:36:36 +0300
Received: from [24.184.136.70] by win.mail.ru with HTTP;
	Tue, 09 Nov 2004 06:36:36 +0300
From: Igor Shmukler <shmukler@mail.ru>
To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19
X-Originating-IP: [24.184.136.70]
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 06:36:36 +0300
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0411082130310.11442-100000@sea.ntplx.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <E1CRMo8-000GCW-00.shmukler-mail-ru@f15.mail.ru>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re[2]: Loadable Scheduler in Freebsd
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Igor Shmukler <shmukler@mail.ru>
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 03:36:38 -0000

> If the schedulers were aware of the "selected" scheduler (or perhaps
> the previous scheduler), they could do the thread removal and insertions
> themselves I suppose.

I doubt you would want to do that.