From owner-freebsd-current Tue Feb 4 2:52:48 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9965537B405 for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:52:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from nagual.pp.ru (pobrecita.freebsd.ru [194.87.13.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C8D643F93 for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 02:52:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: from pobrecita.freebsd.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nagual.pp.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h14Aqid6090274; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:52:45 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache@pobrecita.freebsd.ru) Received: (from ache@localhost) by pobrecita.freebsd.ru (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h14Aqifw090273; Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:52:44 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache) Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:52:44 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: rand() is broken Message-ID: <20030204105244.GA90241@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20030202070644.GA9987@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030202090422.GA59750@nagual.pp.ru> <20030203002639.GB44914@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030203100002.GA73386@nagual.pp.ru> <20030204054020.GA2447@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030204094659.GA87303@nagual.pp.ru> <20030204095839.GB87303@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030204095839.GB87303@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: <freebsd-current.FreeBSD.ORG> List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive) List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-current> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-current> X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:58:40 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > On Tue, Feb 04, 2003 at 12:46:59 +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > > > > Returning to current algorithm, I am interested in good NSHUFF value in > > the range 100-2000. Do you have any findings there? > > Apparently 100 is not enough too, I see repeated pattern in your > program. I'll try other values... Well, I find that bigger values are not better, it means that algorithm limit is reached, so just 100 is good enough... -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message