From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 08:20:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE8337B401 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:20:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp3.libero.it (smtp3.libero.it [193.70.192.127]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3654E43FCB for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 08:20:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ml.ventu@flashnet.it) Received: from soth.ventu (151.38.127.191) by smtp3.libero.it (7.0.012) id 3EE735C600EB03D4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:20:32 +0200 Received: from mailer (xanatar.ventu [10.1.2.6]) by soth.ventu (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with SMTP id h6TFKUPp002600 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:20:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml.ventu@flashnet.it) Message-Id: <200307291520.h6TFKUPp002600@soth.ventu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Post Road Mailer for OS/2 (Green Edition Ver 3.0) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 17:20:29 EST From: Andrea Venturoli X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.35 Subject: Re: Crash with bpf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Andrea Venturoli List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 15:20:34 -0000 ** Reply to note from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 25 Jul 2003 14:17:40 -0400 >> The problem has started to show after an upgrade to 4.6 or 4.7 I believe (but I cannot recall exactly). >> I might as well try an upgrade to 4.8, but I'd rather have more insight. >It's more work to try to track the problem if you're using different >code than (for example, I am on my) system, so upgrading is a help to >the person trying to track it. I understand, but upgrading this machine has a cost and I must be absolutely sure this will not introduce new problems as previous upgrades did. >I don't have enough time to go into this in depth, but see if the >problem is affected by increasing the number of mbufs. Nice suggestion, how do I do that? bye & Thanks av.