From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Oct 14 15:21:38 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5619D2E0
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:21:38 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu
 [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B2288FC0C
 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:21:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu
 [127.0.0.1])
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9EFLWSd057751; 
 Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
 (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu)
Received: (from sgk@localhost)
 by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9EFLVwj057750;
 Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:21:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sgk)
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 08:21:31 -0700
From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
To: Jakub Lach <jakub_lach@mailplus.pl>
Subject: Re: new DragonFly-3.2 scheduler and PostgreSQL comparision with
 FreeBSD 9.1-RC1
Message-ID: <20121014152131.GA57720@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References: <CAJ-VmomzubLrG7apd2tFObo2C_C2J4jRanwdR6foY-x3wcRSuA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1350153522261-5751733.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <5079DCCE.4020901@FreeBSD.org>
 <1350202187139-5751862.post@n5.nabble.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1350202187139-5751862.post@n5.nabble.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2012 15:21:38 -0000

On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 01:09:47AM -0700, Jakub Lach wrote:
> 
> "* Scheduler rewrite"
> 
> They threw out old scheduler and have instant gains? That's 
> too good to be true, seeing as still some loathe ULE in
> FreeBSD after all this time.
> 

'loathe' appears to be an interesting choice of word.
I do not loathe ULE, but I also do not use ULE.  Why?
Because in my testing with my workloads, I found ULE
to perform poorly in comparison to 4BSD.

-- 
Steve