From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 13 10:42:35 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9D737B401; Tue, 13 May 2003 10:42:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sauron.fto.de (p15106025.pureserver.info [217.160.140.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331E543FBF; Tue, 13 May 2003 10:42:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hschaefer@fto.de) Received: from localhost (localhost.fto.de [127.0.0.1]) by sauron.fto.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC0525C0FC; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:42:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from sauron.fto.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sauron [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 01137-08; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:42:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from giskard.foundation.hs (p50919657.dip.t-dialin.net [80.145.150.87]) by sauron.fto.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74E525C0A9; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:42:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from daneel.foundation.hs (daneel.foundation.hs [192.168.20.2]) by giskard.foundation.hs (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA21463; Tue, 13 May 2003 19:42:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from hschaefer@fto.de) Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 19:42:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Heiko Schaefer X-X-Sender: heiko@daneel.foundation.hs To: re@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <200305131300.h4DD0Ecd059610@fledge.watson.org> Message-ID: <20030513193830.Y14785@daneel.foundation.hs> References: <200305131300.h4DD0Ecd059610@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at fto.de cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 5.1-RELEASE TODO X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 17:42:35 -0000 Hello there, this might be the wrong way or place, but i want to state again (as i already stated in my thread about data corruption), that in my opinion it would be not a good idea to make a release of freebsd with the GENERIC kernel config as it is. not having the options options DISABLE_PSE options DISABLE_PG_G in the kernel config caused me data corruption which took hours of testing (and bothering people on this list) to figure out. apparently this problem is widespread and not only relevant to exotic fringe-case systems. regards, Heiko On Tue, 13 May 2003, Robert Watson wrote: > This is an automated bi-daily mailing of the FreeBSD 5.1 open issues list. [...] -- Free Software. Why put up with inferior code and antisocial corporations? http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/why-free.html