From owner-freebsd-net Sun Nov 4 14:47:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f221.pav2.hotmail.com [64.4.37.221]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EADF237B405 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 14:47:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 4 Nov 2001 14:47:53 -0800 Received: from 204.178.20.13 by pv2fd.pav2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 04 Nov 2001 22:47:53 GMT X-Originating-IP: [204.178.20.13] From: "murthy kn" To: maddave@suxx.eu.org Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dummynet (user confused) Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2001 04:17:53 +0530 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Nov 2001 22:47:53.0917 (UTC) FILETIME=[BD4CDED0:01C16582] Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >This is not always true...in some cases packet is passed again to the >firewall code, starting from next rule. > > > dummynet needs ipfw to build a pipe.. but if this rule is hit does it >means that any other will have no effect at all?? > >When "pipe" action is found that correspondes with packet, it is passed to >dummynet code and then packet is passed to the forewalling code again >starting from next rule. -------> A small addition from the "man ipfw" This is the behaviour when "net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass" is not set. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message