From owner-cvs-all Sun Dec 29 11:39:27 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C44537B401; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:39:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from espresso.q9media.com (espresso.q9media.com [65.39.129.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CE843ED4; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:39:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mike@espresso.q9media.com) Received: by espresso.q9media.com (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 6784A9C10; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 14:28:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 14:28:56 -0500 From: Mike Barcroft To: Mark Valentine Cc: Garrett Wollman , cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys _iovec.h socket.h uio.h Message-ID: <20021229142856.E98334@espresso.q9media.com> References: <200212291802.gBTI20aj008737@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <200212291924.gBTJOb8r037706@dotar.thuvia.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200212291924.gBTJOb8r037706@dotar.thuvia.org>; from mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk on Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 07:24:37PM +0000 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark Valentine writes: > > From: Garrett Wollman > > Date: Sun 29 Dec, 2002 > > Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/sys _iovec.h socket.h uio.h > > > < said: > > > > > Where else is ssize_t defined? > > > > In every header that uses it. That's the X/Op^H^H^H^HPOSIX Way. > > Oh. I've never seen that stated in my reading of the standard or rationale > (and couldn't find it stated in my on-line copy). > > I did, however, find it also defined in , , , > (which I missed earlier), which invalidates my argument, supports > Mike's statement, and answers my question. > > However, ssize_t is _not_ defined in , , , > where it is also used, though each of these headers _may_ (not _shall_) > make ssize_t visible as defined in and/or . This > may be a bug in the standard. does define it. I have a patch for in my tree. I still need to work on and less than a dozen other standard headers. Best regards, Mike Barcroft To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message