From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Aug 21  0: 1:45 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 928CD15373
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 00:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id BAA58583;
	Sat, 21 Aug 1999 01:01:28 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id BAA41654; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 01:01:35 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199908210701.BAA41654@harmony.village.org>
To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: at_shutdown going away 
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Aug 1999 00:37:20 PDT."
		<199908190737.AAA04137@dingo.cdrom.com> 
References: <199908190737.AAA04137@dingo.cdrom.com>  
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 01:01:35 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <199908190737.AAA04137@dingo.cdrom.com> Mike Smith writes:
: Seriously though, I'm in the process of replacing a number of the 
: ad-hoc event handler callout lists in the kernel (most notably the 
: at_shutdown and apm* lists) with a generic implementation.

Shouldn't the apm stuff use the new-bus hooks?  I've migraded a couple
of uses in pccard to using that now that I have newbus node to hang
them off of...

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message