From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 25 06:51:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA6916A4CE; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:51:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from gw.celabo.org (gw.celabo.org [208.42.49.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA16943D49; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 06:51:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nectar@celabo.org) Received: from madman.celabo.org (madman.celabo.org [10.0.1.111]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "madman.celabo.org", Issuer "celabo.org CA" (verified OK)) by gw.celabo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 632AD5485D; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:51:25 -0600 (CST) Received: by madman.celabo.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 03E636D455; Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:51:24 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 08:51:24 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040325145124.GB61830@madman.celabo.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" , Garance A Drosihn , Jilles Tjoelker , arch@freebsd.org, freebsd-standards@freebsd.org References: <20040322155901.GA17891@stack.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Url: http://www.celabo.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: arch@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PATCH for a more-POSIX `ps', and related adventures X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 14:51:26 -0000 On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 01:18:22PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Great. So what should I do here? I dunno. Add a completely POSIX compliant ps command into /usr/posix ? Or replace /usr/bin/ps with a completely POSIX compliant ps and move our traditional one to /usr/ucb? :-) Seriously, we should give some hard thought into how to provide/migrate to a POSIX compatible utilities environment. It's been discussed on the lists before, but I still believe providing POSIX compatible versions of utilities on a separate path is the only clean way to make this happen. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org