From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 15 20:10:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F7C1065676; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:10:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitry@andric.com) Received: from tensor.andric.com (cl-327.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:146::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98CA78FC16; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:10:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitry@andric.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:9495:274b:b36c:ce34] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:9495:274b:b36c:ce34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B206311F838; Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:10:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <496F9823.4060503@andric.com> Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:10:11 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090108 Shredder/3.0b2pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim References: <8dfae1c10901070639x67945324jeeecfcac647d7976@mail.gmail.com> <20090113050223.GH46346@cdnetworks.co.kr> <496CB2E7.2060902@andric.com> <200901131806.02868.jkim@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200901131806.02868.jkim@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: pyunyh@gmail.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, eugene@donpac.ru Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.1 Breaks re and rl Network Interface Drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:10:16 -0000 On 2009-01-14 00:05, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > Can you try one of the following patches? > > -CURRENT: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/re/re.current.diff > -STABLE: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/re/re.stable.diff > > These patches contain all patches suggested by me and yongari and an > additional patch, which may (or may not) decrease the initial setup > time. I have applied the -STABLE patch, and while this doesn't have much influence on the initial setup time, it does seem to solve the problem of not being able to send any packets.