From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 4 08:40:12 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A43C3106564A; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rrs@lakerest.net) Received: from lakerest.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:240:585:2:213:d4ff:fef3:2d8d]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5190F8FC0C; Fri, 4 Feb 2011 08:40:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.1.53] ([10.1.1.53]) (authenticated bits=0) by lakerest.net (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p148eBsM072506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 4 Feb 2011 03:40:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rrs@lakerest.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Randall Stewart In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 03:40:10 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5261CAA5-4ACB-4B0D-BB56-BD9FEAC85555@lakerest.net> References: <201102031005.p13A5Vwi040803@svn.freebsd.org> To: Robert Watson X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r218211 - in head/sys: conf netinet X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2011 08:40:12 -0000 On Feb 4, 2011, at 1:40 AM, Robert Watson wrote: >=20 > On Thu, 3 Feb 2011, Randall Stewart wrote: >=20 >> Author: rrs >> Date: Thu Feb 3 10:05:30 2011 >> New Revision: 218211 >> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/218211 >>=20 >> Log: >> Adds an experimental option to create a pool of >> threads. These serve as input threads and are queued >> packets based on the V-tag number. This is similar to >> what a modern card can do with queue's for TCP... but >> alas modern cards know nothing about SCTP. >=20 > Hmm. It might be better to add a new NETISR_SCTP and use netisr's = support for multithreading? >=20 > (I'm preparing a patch for review that enhances that a bit so that = protocols can be a bit more expressive in terms of specifying dispatch = policy, etc, currently). >=20 > Robert Robert: Let me know when the patch goes in and point me in the general direction of what code to look at and I will convert it to use it... In the mean time I will do a couple of minor fixes that jb suggested and then use this for the measurements I am doing ;) R ------------------------------ Randall Stewart 803-317-4952 (cell)