From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 14 02:05:34 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4201E37B401 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:05:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spork.pantherdragon.org (spork.pantherdragon.org [206.29.168.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2C943F3F for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:05:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dmp@pantherdragon.org) Received: from sparx.techno.pagans (12-224-208-117.client.attbi.com [12.224.208.117]) by spork.pantherdragon.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 388B6FD96 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:05:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from speck.techno.pagans (speck.techno.pagans [172.21.42.2]) by sparx.techno.pagans (Postfix) with SMTP id 68169A913 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 02:04:06 -0700 From: Darren Pilgrim To: FreeBSD-Chat Message-Id: <20030414020406.2d0b0fad.dmp@pantherdragon.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.9claws (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Any tricks for updating massive meta-ports like KDE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:05:34 -0000 I recently updated my ports tree, and of course XFree86 and KDE3 have been updated. The problem is the size of these ports and their meta nature. Updating XFree86 means updating a dozen or more XFree86-* ports, Xft, and a handful of dependancies. Updating KDE3 is easily twice that, and the build time is huge. I don't trust portupgrade to get this kind of update right. Does anyone have any tricks for handling an update like this?