From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 11 21:40:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C621116A46D for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8020613C484 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Hxrco-0006c5-JW for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:40:34 +0200 Received: from 78-1-108-42.adsl.net.t-com.hr ([78.1.108.42]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:40:34 +0200 Received: from ivoras by 78-1-108-42.adsl.net.t-com.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:40:34 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:40:22 +0200 Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: <20070611161148.GA19299@keira.kiwi-computer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigADF7CCE2CDB56F9FE8B3CDBF" X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 78-1-108-42.adsl.net.t-com.hr User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Windows/20070509) In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.3.0 Sender: news Subject: Re: Inode density for database machines - newfs -i X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 21:40:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigADF7CCE2CDB56F9FE8B3CDBF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Francisco Reyes wrote: > Ivan Voras writes: >=20 >> How long fsck takes depends on the number of used inodes, not the tota= l >> number. Barring a bug in UFS, you should be able to have as little >> inodes as you want, especially if you know for sure what number to >> expect. >=20 > "man tuning" says otherwise. As Rick already clarified, this is a side-effect of UFS2. Actually, fsck for UFS2 will need to check all "initialized" inodes, e.g. if you had a file, then deleted it, that inode will still need to be checked, but never-initialized nodes won't. tuning(7) probably wasn't updated. --------------enigADF7CCE2CDB56F9FE8B3CDBF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGbcFGldnAQVacBcgRAhU2AJ9tYpUkcP0gEkcDOOEv5zM2T29oeACg8kiX 1+EFOIWAaw1Fj47TQz5KJ2U= =gOxX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigADF7CCE2CDB56F9FE8B3CDBF--