From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 17 23:52:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D55106567E for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:52:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from animelovin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-f182.google.com (mail-qc0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204778FC18 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:52:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so3128034qcs.13 for ; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:51:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:subject:x-priority:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=l0wjoPJ3N0Y2tYjOE+dHDPhKodHDIxpORZGayBRgXis=; b=iqhj8TkD6OBBaf44Cl9C32BrrlkxbbDE5dn/9Vz9z/SAmrB951kTeLMUTkvOyvtCY9 NoeMk2WP2bmaD455/h8AdE+SKpoh/QWtX/pxhxh9EHmQSUB7o7Y3z7KGp3820Zsq7G08 6mpdxM26pcz0s4oeZnSWOJ4yZg9S/MkY+yZL3yol1TsRibF+lRiNKufpxOQegF9ZT6XW KFiyWd3y+pdeXsCf7IqZbBYRuDWIh4XBByIN+p0seUnZAe3Y2O7gREXcJkkav4byruRJ jYHV75q+0tWLI/w0z/CYJiT4+9YI+1dgOkOVNb2HHJT2ckfmC7u+vk226JyYsu5ZHdDU jUjQ== Received: by 10.224.86.194 with SMTP id t2mr23892890qal.95.1339977119277; Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (modemcable107.221-22-96.mc.videotron.ca. [96.22.221.107]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id di8sm37772616qab.8.2012.06.17.16.51.57 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 17 Jun 2012 16:51:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FDE6D9E.8090809@gthcfoundation.org> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 19:51:58 -0400 From: Etienne Robillard Organization: gthcfoundation.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Petter Selasky , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Priority: 2 (High) References: <201206151819.32398.hselasky@c2i.net> <4FDB6AA3.3040606@gmail.com> <201206172152.55303.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <201206172152.55303.hselasky@c2i.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: How to bind a route to a network adapter and not IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: erob@gthcfoundation.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 23:52:00 -0000 On 06/17/2012 03:52 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 15 June 2012 19:02:27 animelovin@gmail.com wrote: >> Perhaps you can ask the very same question in another way so its easier >> to understand why you losing packets? All in all I always thought TCP/IP >> was the basic unit in Internet based networking but feel free to correct >> me if you have any news I might have missed... :) >> >> Also do you have any idea why AMD based CPUs could be vulnerable to this >> alternative networking scheme and cause a remote denial service in fbsd >> stable but not in CURRENT? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Etienne > > Hi, > > I loose packets because I use a WLAN adapter. Sometimes the link is down for > various reasons, and then the routes start changing for manually created > routes, and I want to prevent that. > > --HPS Hi Hans, As per the usual PR triage workflow, I recommend you fill a bug report and add me to the CC list. :-) And based on your comment I figure I'm not the only one to complain with recent FreeBSD TCP/IP based networking issues... *** TEMPORARY SOLUTION *** WORKAROUND *** As a workaround, or until FreeBSD has approved a WITHOUT_OFDM option, I recommend you consider one of the following options: 1. Change your network adapter to Ethernet-class carrier for TCP/IP dynamic routing. 2. Switch to CCK modulation (if you really MUST stick with wireless IP encapsulation.... .) % ifconfig mode 11b % man ifconfig(8) for more info. In case you really want to stick with wireless based carrier (HIGHLY NOT RECOMMENDED for *ALL* FreeBSD users until it has been demonstrated that there is no privacy disclosure or potential health issues with any wireless frequency modulation scheme), consider using CCK modulation (802.11b) which should be point-to-point modulation scheme. Btw I believe this is a separate issue than the previous OpenSSL/libpng remote vulnerability (sysret) discussed a few days ago but as you comment suggest this bug should only imply wireless-based devices using the iEEE 802.11 stack for high-speed frequency modulation. Regards, Etienne References ---------- 1. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-chat/2011-March/006577.html 2. https://gthc.org/wiki/Advisories/OFDM_20110315 -- Etienne Robillard Occupation: Software Developer Company: Green Tea Hackers Club Email: erob@gthcfoundation.org Website: gthcfoundation.org Skype ID: incidah "Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery." -- Winston Churchill