From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Nov  4 14:37:33 1995
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id OAA16512
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 14:37:33 -0800
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA16497
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 14:37:28 -0800
Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.v-site.net [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA06486; Sat, 4 Nov 1995 14:37:12 -0800
Message-Id: <199511042237.OAA06486@rah.star-gate.com>
To: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey)
cc: hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers)
Subject: Re: Anyone got FreeBSD working a P6? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 04 Nov 1995 22:49:57 +0100."
             <199511042149.WAA21203@allegro.lemis.de> 
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 1995 14:37:08 -0800
From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>>> Greg Lehey said:
 > Amancio Hasty Jr. writes:
 > > 
 > > I was just reading comp.sys.intel and the 200Mhz P6's performance looks
 > > really cool 8)
 > 
 > Don't believe it.  The magazines over here are full of the fact that
 > it's a flop, since it takes forever to change from 32 to 16 bit mode
 > and back again.
 > 
 > 
 > Whatever that may mean :-)
 > Greg

Yeap, it means a whole lot because we would not see a vast 
performance improvement from the horde of 16apps that we have 8)


	Cheers,
	Amancio