From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 11 18:17:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A9F106564A for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:17:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (77-99-36-42.cable.ubr04.chap.blueyonder.co.uk [77.99.36.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB688FC1C for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:17:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40CFB1CC83; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by dns1.vizion2000.net (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m6BIcajJ040810; Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:38:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) X-Authentication-Warning: dns1.vizion2000.net: david set sender to david@vizion2000.net using -f From: David Southwell Organization: Voice and Vision To: Robert Huff Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 11:38:36 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 References: <200807100340.38399.david@vizion2000.net> <200807110919.50885.david@vizion2000.net> <18551.34465.624986.569002@jerusalem.litteratus.org> In-Reply-To: <18551.34465.624986.569002@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200807111138.36884.david@vizion2000.net> Cc: Vivek Khera , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Parv Subject: Re: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 18:17:07 -0000 On Friday 11 July 2008 09:13:21 Robert Huff wrote: > David Southwell writes: > > > As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding-edge > > > Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.) > > > > That sounds a bit complacent to me. I hope others are not likely > > to be so dismissive of the needs of others. > > And sometimes, a cigar is just a cigar. > I have ports installed that are Perl-based, or require Perl for > compilation; I am not a Perl programmer, much less a zealot; I did > not even know 5.10 was out. > If there's a reason to have it - beyond having the latest > pretty thing - then let that case be made. (Allies gathered, the > cause advanced, ....) > If there's a reason we don't have it yet, then let's hear about > that as well. > > > Robert Huff If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend their time arguing and we would have none atall. It is not as though Perl is an obscure bit of buggy code that none uses. If there is a request then simply a response to your last question is needed. Enough david.