From nobody Sat May 20 16:49:51 2023 X-Original-To: questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4QNqSm4Kcdz4CGTM for ; Sat, 20 May 2023 16:50:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from mx2.blackfoot.net (mx2.blackfoot.net [216.14.232.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.blackfoot.net", Issuer "RapidSSL Global TLS RSA4096 SHA256 2022 CA1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QNqSl4ZJnz3JQV for ; Sat, 20 May 2023 16:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=blackfoot.net header.s=ew header.b=TuHPQGwI; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of vagabond@blackfoot.net designates 216.14.232.11 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=vagabond@blackfoot.net; dmarc=none Received: from bmfe2.blackfoot.net ([66.109.128.162]) by mx2.blackfoot.net ({0885e9ce-1b01-11e7-852e-37eff1d936ea}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20230520164951887_0000 for ; Sat, 20 May 2023 10:49:51 -0600 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from webmail.blackfoot.net (unknown [192.168.100.133]) by bmfe2.blackfoot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659F58062C for ; Sat, 20 May 2023 10:49:51 -0600 (MDT) List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 09:49:51 -0700 From: vagabond To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sendmail error, "MX list for mydomain.com points back to server.mydomain.com" In-Reply-To: <3d6bvtk7qc2iqhkjcjamxvv27a2zoe3oz2574incudld4bvlub@emxmu4uu7rfn> References: <15AF7ED7-BBD9-428D-939F-4AA5B349C578@gushi.org> <66db9ba3bd66fcc56affdbf7a2621021@blackfoot.net> <2f8bca59462afe206043bea73241bbf2@blackfoot.net> <3da26eb675ecd5d10947fb53fcf3524a@blackfoot.net> <6068541D-A81B-45F0-B961-FD5CD6969FA0@gushi.org> <3d6bvtk7qc2iqhkjcjamxvv27a2zoe3oz2574incudld4bvlub@emxmu4uu7rfn> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4.11 Message-ID: <339ea89805a607fd0c31c6bf6e9080f1@blackfoot.net> X-Sender: vagabond@blackfoot.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-MAG-OUTBOUND: blackfoot.redcondor.net@66.109.128.162/32 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=TuHPQGwI2VTaJNDSSalr3zljRTyCCRtEDgQCTxPkjhAoXVD5pmbKXuAIMi6XtVlTv6FgvjHTkmS1AT+Q4u2+Cfb1xT4kjhhYFu+Z3/eY8UPwJCIrhAMKy2G5R40lIPg+eT2X9B+TZra9IzSSzwjlpbqrY+HuhAv8ixhnvOzDYHixXQu7hzb8BriGXnG1eCLlM+YZn4B4zf9Q122fXx7J/bqzi5A7Url5Gvgidf1R39qG+PJ5TflS1Iz0ho4pE/Z2Jz4FuPSHAHi7+ThQU3xDJqzvCV29yIO5Tt9wRuEuWBxQGhRm+hhJPxifelEK2dOzOYv27R/tw5WP9g0RVmxWbQ==; s=ew; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=blackfoot.net; v=1; bh=Qd+suLjiQVNrHJZ6ndHA9mi54jS6QHL21hYypso/RpU=; h=from:to:message-id; X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.49 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.994]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[blackfoot.net:s=ew]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[blackfoot.net:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[blackfoot.net]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21947, ipnet:216.14.224.0/19, country:US]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4QNqSl4ZJnz3JQV X-Spamd-Bar: --- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 2023-05-20 09:01, little.analyst892@aceecat.org wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 09:45:34PM -0700, vagabond wrote: > >> Another path I'm considering is installing postfix and seeing what >> it thinks, but I'm going to spend a little more time beating on this >> first. > > Or exim (my cup of tea). > > Do you have a particular reason for trying to live without IPv6? > > I think it's about time we all switched. My website is only available > over IPv6, for one. No particular reason; at one point my ISP did not deal with ipv6. Path of lest resistance. Thought maybe I'd manage to die before I had to deal with it :-) Gary